Jump to content

Talk:Bonaventure

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Confusing section" template

[edit]

I have added a template indicating that the Philosophy section of this article is confusing to readers. See the above discussion on this page under the section heading "Not written in encyclopedic style" for my thoughts on the problem. — AlekJDS talk 05:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems clear enough to me; so what specifically do you want clarified? carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 04:36, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two dates for canonization

[edit]

The top biographical section gives the date for canonization as 14 April 1482 by Pope Sixtus IV. The section "Feast day" repeats the year of canonization as 1482. The section "Theology and works" gives the date of canonization as 1484 by Pope Sixtus IV. I recommend someone investigate, correct the error(s), eliminate repetition, and add a detailed reference to the date settled on. Theo2amore (talk) 02:48, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

[edit]

The entire philosophy section appears to be plagiarized from the sources cited at the end of each paragraph. According to Wikipedia's guidelines on plagiarism, the section should be erased, or rewritten to include paraphrase and quotations. 74.77.143.77 (talk) 23:44, 27 September 2014 (UTC) student[reply]

If you're referring to the 1907 Catholic Encyclopedia entry or the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, both appear to be public domain. Mannanan51 (talk) 05:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

Important info missing: Why was he sainted with the name Bonaventure when his real name was Johnny Fidanza? And wouldn't it be spelled Buonaventura since he was Italian (Papal States)? - Tangverse (talk) 05:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'Life' section - why Roger Bacon?

[edit]

The Life section refers extensively to people other than Bonaventure, but it's not clear why they are mentioned (their connection to his life). Can anyone knowledgable fix this? Eteb3 (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonaventura ışık teorisi

[edit]

Bonaventura De Reductione Artium ad Theologiam başlığını taşıyan yapıtında, özellikle Robertus Grossetesta ve Rogerus Baco’nun etkisi altında geliştirdiği ışık teorisini sergilemektedir. Ona göre ışık dört değişik biçimde anlaşılmalıdır. Buna göre, mekanik yetinin ışığı olan “dışsal ışık” sanat ve zanaatları aydınlatır. Buna mekanik yeti denmektedir; zira sanat ve zanaatlar insanın dışındadırlar ve cisim ya da cisimlere gereksinim duymaktadırlar. İkinci türden ışık aşağı ışık türüdür; duyu algısını harekete geçirir ve doğal formlarla ilgilidir. Üçüncü ışık türü ise içsel ışıktır ve zihinsel hakikatleri aydınlatır. Dördüncü ve sonuncu ışık ise daha yüksek ışıktır ve hakikatleri saklama görevi vardır. İnsan aklının, hakikatleri keşfetmek, dolayısıyla zihinsel bilgiyi elde etmek için bu ışığa gereksinimi vardır. Fikret Fırat (talk) 09:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]